Higher education-New era

Ethics publications and unfair practices

The validation of a paper in question and its importance must reflect the interest of researchers and readers in the novelty and originality of the scientific approach. The decision of the editor regarding the articles to be published must be taken on a clear basis stipulated in the publication requirements of the journal. These refer to:

• The fidelity of the presentation, the representativeness and the academic importance.
• Protection and promotion of intellectual property rights and must not publish information if there is reason to believe that it is plagiarism or misconduct.
• Only the intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, social organization or political philosophy of the authors, is decisive in choosing the best works.
• Unpublished materials will not be used in any way in the interest of individuals or third parties, and information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential.

Ethical principles in the reviewer work

Peer review helps the publisher make editorial decisions and, through editorial communication with the author, can help the author improve his work. This is why a reviewer's actions should be impartial.

• Any manuscript received for review should be treated as confidential documents. They must not be presented or discussed with others unless authorized by the publisher.
• Evaluations must be performed objectively. Without author's personal criticism they should express their views clearly, with supporting arguments.
• Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
• Any selected reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Principles that should guide the author of scientific publications

The authors realize that they are responsible for the content, the arguments, the ideas promoted, the novelty and the fidelity of the research results.

• Present an accurate description of the research work carried out
• The results and conclusions should be accurately represented in the paper in order to be repeatable and applicable in practice.
• Any fraudulent or inaccurate arguments made knowingly are unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
• An author must confirm that he / she wrote the entire work in its original form, and if the author used the work and / or the words of others, then they were quoted or quoted accordingly. Plagiarism in all its forms is unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
• The author must always give adequate recognition to the work of others.
• The author must cite the publications that formed the basis of the reported paper. Privately obtained information, such as in conversations, correspondence or discussions with third parties, must not be used or reported without the express written permission of the source.  
• The information obtained during the confidential review must not be used without the express written permission of the persons involved in these services.
• An author should avoid publishing manuscripts that describe essentially the same research in several journals or primary publications. Sending the same manuscript to several journals at the same time constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
• An author should not submit for examination a previously published paper or partially modified papers that investigate the same issue in slightly different situations.
• All contributors who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.The corresponding author must ensure and confirm that all co-authors have approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

• When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his or her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to withdraw or correct the work. If the publisher finds out from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it has the obligation to notify the author and to withdraw or correct the work promptly.

Authorship identification

Authorship identification means obtaining assurances that each author of the manuscript's group of authors has contributed to the research, in a certain part of it.

Conflict of interest

When submitting a manuscript to the HENEJ, authors must declare the presence/absence of any competing financial and/or non-financial interests.
In the interests of transparency and to help readers form their own judgments about possible bias, the HENEJ requires authors to declare any competing financial and/or non-financial interests in the work described.
 Authors should indicate all the information necessary to confirm transparency in terms of potential financial interests. If such a conflict is detected at the stage of reviewing, the reviewer is obliged to inform the editorial office of this and refuse to review this manuscript.  

Handling complaints

If complaints are received by the editorial office, their validity is checked.
The editorial of the journal implements all procedures aimed at ensuring, guaranteeing and adhering to all ethical standards and principles of academic integrity.

Archiving

All publications of this journal will be stored in electronic and printed versions in the editorial office of the journal. The journal's website provides an opportunity for authors to download and save their articles.

Publication policy regarding advertising

Advertising placed on the pages of the journal must be directly or indirectly related to the subject of the journal, that is, contain information about products, technologies, services in areas related to the subject of the journal.
Advertising is not integrated with the main content and are published on separate pages/tabs.

Peer Review Process

The editorial board practices OPEN peer review. This process involves the following:

• First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.
• Following the decision of the editors, the manuscripts submitted are sent to at least two external experts in the corresponding field.
• Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision.
• The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.

Terms of Payment

The cost of one article submitted for publication and designed according to the requirements of the journal is 40000 tugrug (4-6 pages).
Include: The prepress preparation of the article , editing in HENJ format template, checking the tables, figures, design of the references list (design according to the standards, searching and adding DOI identifiers and setting the digital DOI identifier for your article).